Supreme Court Defines Presidential Immunity: Official Acts Protected, Unofficial Acts Not
A Win for Trump: Supreme Court Ruling Delays Legal Proceedings Until After Elections
The United States Supreme Court ruled today that all American Presidents, past and present, including Trump, Biden, Obama, and Bush, have immunity for their official acts but none for unofficial actions. In Trump's case, the Court remanded Jack Smith's indictments to the DC court to distinguish between official and unofficial acts. This decision is likely to delay the outcome until after the elections, which is seen as a win for Trump.
Generally speaking, an "official act" for a president typically refers to actions taken as part of their official duties and responsibilities in their capacity as the head of state and government. These acts are performed in the execution of their constitutional and legal duties.
Key Takeaways:
Official Acts: Signing legislation, issuing executive orders, appointing federal officials, conducting foreign policy, granting pardons, delivering the State of the Union.
Non-Official Acts: Campaign activities, personal actions, political endorsements, social events, public statements on personal opinions.
Implications for Trump: The DC court will determine which of Trump's actions were official. This process is expected to take time, potentially extending beyond the upcoming elections.
Broader Impact: The ruling clarifies that presidential immunity is limited to official duties, ensuring accountability for actions outside those boundaries.